Evan Bynoe vs Kuang Qing Xu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

Published on 11 Aug at 04:03 PM UTC

HEAD TO HEAD

E. Bynoe vs K. Qing Xu

Evan Bynoe
Evan Bynoe

Flag USA USA

l
l
w
w
l
w
l
l
l
l
Kuang Qing Xu
Kuang Qing Xu

Flag CAN CAN

w
l
l
l
l
w
w
w
w
l

2

Win

2

Played

0

Win

26
Age
19
-
Height
-
882
C. Rank
0
881
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Bynoe 2 - 0 Xu

They have played 5 sets in total, with Evan Bynoe winning 4 and Kuang Qing Xu winning 1. The last match between Evan Bynoe and Kuang Qing Xu was at the M15 Huntsville, 11-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Evan Bynoe getting the victory 0-6 6-1 4-1 ret..

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Bynoe2
Xu0
Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R1M15 Huntsville(08-11-25)

Clay
USA Flag
Evan Bynoe
0
6
4
CAN Flag
Kuang Qing Xu
6
1
1

(Q1M15 Ithaca(10-02-23)

I.hard
USA Flag
Evan Bynoe
6
6
CAN Flag
Kuang Qing Xu
3
2

E. Bynoe vs K. Q. Xu H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
50.27% (92-91)Career Total W/L60.00% (33-22)
1Clay0
1Indoor0
0Titles1
2Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

E. Bynoe vs K. Q. Xu Match Preview:

  • In recent months, Xu's second serve points win rate is 41.76%, while Bynoe's is higher at 46.64%. Who has the edge here? Bynoe, with a better second serve performance.
  • Xu successfully wins 41.94% of opponents' second serve points, compared to Bynoe's 48.12%. In terms of first serve returns, Xu is at 29.01% and Bynoe slightly better at 29.75%.
  • Under pressure, Xu saves 43.14% of breakpoints, whereas Bynoe does better, saving 52.2%.
  • Overall match win rates from last year show Xu winning 70.59% (12/5), while Bynoe has a lower rate at 55.38% (36/29).
  • Both excel on clay, with Xu winning 79% of matches and Bynoe 60%. Conversely, Xu struggles more on hard surfaces (44%), while Bynoe is less effective on indoor hard (43%).
  • When considering player levels, both have mainly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K with Xu performing better overall.
  • In direct matchups, Bynoe leads Xu, having won their sole encounter (M15 Ithaca, indoor hard) in straight sets.
  • Xu has faced opponents with an average rank of 392.29 over the last year, while Bynoe has encountered more challenging opponents with an average rank of 272.69.
  • Xu has a superior record in deciding sets, with a 71% win rate compared to Bynoe's 57%.
  • Xu converts breakpoints at 33.33%, slightly lower than Bynoe's 38.28%, offering Bynoe a potential in-game advantage.

Editorial Prediction (August 11, 2025, UTC):

Both players demonstrate particular strengths and weaknesses. Xu performs better on clay and has a higher overall win rate over the past year. Their ability to win deciding sets may come into play if this match goes the distance.

However, Bynoe shows stronger performance in recent matchups, especially in return games and second serve points, while also having a better record against higher-ranked opponents.

Considering Bynoe's previous victory over Xu and their edge in second serve and return game statistics, Bynoe is more likely to secure a win in this upcoming match.

Evan Bynoe vs Kuang Qing Xu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

E. Bynoe vs K. Q. Xu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
2H2H Matches Won0
4Sets Won1
22Games Won13
2Aces (Total)2
5Total Double Faults1
1:13:10Average Match Time1:13:10
62% (42/68)1st Serve %67% (45/67)
60% (25/42)1st Serve Win %51% (23/45)
54% (14/26)2nd Serve Win %55% (12/22)
44% (4/9)Break Pts Won %30% (3/10)
48% (32/67)Return Points Win %43% (29/68)
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑5 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Bynoe 46%, Xu 51%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Bynoe 48%, Xu 56%.
Break Points Saved %: Bynoe 57%, Xu 61%.

E. Bynoe Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
I.hardM15 Tallahassee - 17-11-2025

R1

USAR. Ferrer
L
6-4 6-1
ClayM15 Orlando - 10-11-2025

R1

USAJ. Kennedy
L
6-3 7-6(5)
ClayM15 Orlando - 03-11-2025

R1

USAN. Johnston
L
6-3 7-5
I.hardM15 Trois-Rivieres - 27-10-2025

R2

USAB. Suarez
L
7-5 7-6(2)

R1

USAM. Thomson
W
6-1 7-6(7)

K. Q. Xu Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardM15 Winston-Salem - 29-09-2025

QF

JPNS. Mitsui
L
6-2 6-3

R2

USAJ. Kennedy
W
6-4 6-3

R1

USAO. Vasser
W
6-1 1-6 6-4

Q3

USAT. Stringer
W
6-1 3-6 10-7

Q1

USAN. Parichkov
W
7-5 6-1
banner

E. Bynoe vs K. Q. Xu Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
50.27% (92/91)YTD Win/Loss60.00% (33/22)
50.00% (205/205)Sets Win/Loss56.80% (71/54)
50.30% (1920/1897)Games Win/Loss54.68% (631/523)
46.24% (43/50)Hard Win/Loss52.38% (11/10)
59.09% (39/27)Clay Win/Loss73.33% (11/4)
41.67% (10/14)Indoor Hard W/L57.89% (11/8)
0.13Aces Per Game0.23
240Aces Total129
0.21Double Faults Per Game0.17
388Total Double Faults94
1st MatchAverage Match Time1st Match
73.36Average Opponent Rank277.11
62% (4226/6785)1st Serve %56% (1049/1878)
63% (2643/4226)1st Serve Win %68% (718/1049)
45% (1149/2559)2nd Serve Win %50% (418/829)
43% (272/628)Break Points Won % (Total)50% (104/208)
39% (2568/6512)Return Points Win %43% (747/1750)
50.00% (2/2)Challenger W/L0.00% (0/1)
50.28% (90/89)Futures W/L61.11% (33/21)
50% (89/179)Best of 3 Sets Win %61% (33/54)
100% (3/3)Best of 5 Sets Win %0% (0/1)
48% (21/44)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)38% (3/8)
50% (21/42)Deciding Set Win %71% (10/14)
88% (93/82)1st Set Won, Won Match94% (33/31)
11% (93/10)1st Set Won, Lost Match6% (33/2)
11% (90/10)1st Set Lost, Won Match9% (22/2)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

Mon, 24 Nov, 09:00 AM
Prediction
SYRH. NaowPR
GREI. Xilas
W1
3.34
W2
1.27
Mon, 24 Nov, 08:00 AM
Prediction
AUTM. UjvaryALT
SWEL. Borg7
W1
3.74
W2
1.22
Mon, 24 Nov, 08:00 AM
Prediction
AUSA. ArconALT
SUIJ. Nikles
W1
8.9
W2
1.025
Sun, 23 Nov, 03:30 AM
Prediction
GBRF. Bass
JPNS. Hazawa
W1
2.03
W2
1.68
Sun, 23 Nov, 03:30 AM
Prediction
AUSB. Walkin
JPNL. Vithoontien
W1
3.04
W2
1.32
Sun, 23 Nov, 12:20 PM
Prediction
TUNA. Ouakaa
USAO. Vasser
W1
1.41
W2
2.64